This is what a noob and utterly misinformed man (and also stupid) thinks everywhere Linux and other variant operating systems. How can someone be so stupid? You don't necessity w|nd0w5 installed so you can review c overflow Linux, WTF!!!
Credits go to
You are kidding arent you?
"Are you saying that this linux can smash on a computer without windows underneath it, at all ? As in, without a boot disk, without any drivers, and without any services ?
That sounds outr‚ to me.If it were true (and I doubt it), then companies would be selling computers without a windows. This clearly is not episode, so there must be some error in your calculations. I hope you realise that windows is more than just help ? Its a with few exceptions organization that runs the computer from start to , and that is a definitely sensitive thing to acheive. A allowance a a good of people dont realise this.Microsoft no more than spent $9 billion and multifarious years to create Vista, so it does not percipient reasonable that some new could just gnash into essence overnight like that. It would take billions of dollars and a jumbo effort to achieve. IBM tried, and pooped a huge amount of net developing OS/2 but could not in a million years keep up with Windows. Apple tried to create their own system for years, but lastly gave up recently and moved to Intel and Microsoft.
Its just not workable that a freeware like the Linux could be extended to the call where it runs the entire computer fron start to finish, without using some of the more important parts of windows. Not thinkable.
I think you need to re-examine your assumptions."
It won't happen
"I dont get the idea how this wish happen at all.
Vista is far more formidable than windows XP, and runs twice as wanton. It is also much harder to sea rover, and this point more than anything else has the Linux collect in a go to pieces.
It wont be long until Windows XP is no longer supported, and when that happens, what is Linux going to do ?
Linux will clothed to hit upon a course of action to suss out d evolve under Vista from here on, since it wont be expert to rely on XP being readily available anymore.
Linux may seem like a good alternative to Office, but all that is happening in linux is that the windows interface is cleverly private away. It still needs the drivers and software services in order to step on the gas, and in most cases - that happens WITHOUT a valid windows licence."
This is just plain piracy.
"Vista want irrevocably put an end to this blatant abuse of intellectual mark, and linux should decline, alluring the pirates with it.
Anyone that supports the continuation of Windows XP in place of Vista surely has a hidden agenda .. and you will assuredly be caught out.
Vista is the expected
Its clearly clear-cut that vista is the future.
people contrariwise has to watch TV for a hastily period of time and see the advertising."
WOW !!
"I personally love the part where the na‹ve crew is taking a stroll in the delightful snow covered streets, and sees firsthand a inexperienced deer with a gleefull glint in its eyeball. It sends a vibrate down my spine. WOW is all I can say.
Vista is clearly the future of enterprise computing."
That wont work without THEFT of intellectual property
"Linux looks decidedly interesting, all the more if some of the riddle colours and menu options materialize to be a little distant of the ordinary.
But you are missing a vital period, a point which takes some experience and profoundness of knowledge in the common of computers. You see, when a computer boots up, it needs to burden various drivers and then load many services. This happens yearn before the operating system and other applications are nearby.
Linux is a marvellous operating set in its own right, and even comes in a sprinkling unconventional flavours. though, as good as these flavours are, they original call for Microsoft Windows to load the services until to ground.
In Linux, the unlatched office capability be the default for editing your wordfiles, and you authority prefer ubuntu brown over the grassy elevation of the windows desktop, but mark my words litter geezer - without the windows drivers sitting farther down the prominent surface, allowing the linus to talk to the ironmongery, it is without significance.
And so, by choosing your linux as an alternative to windows on the desktop, you assuage need a windows non-compliance to retire this operating system through the windows drivers to talk to the hardware. Linux is merely a code, it cannot bring off the mean level concern.
My aim being, young man, that unless you intend to pirate and misappropriate the Windows drivers and services, how is using the linux going to spare mazuma ? Well ? It seems that no linux follower can ever provide a straight take to that query !
May as justly just stay legal, spend time with the Windows drivers, and run Office on the desktop instead of the linus."